Cut peak warranty processing time by up to 84% — from 25hrs/week to under 4
Playbooks

The Shopify warranty stack: combining helpdesk, returns, and fault claims

Three tools, three jobs. Here's how to wire them together so warranty claims stop colliding with general support.

On this page8 sections
  1. The three jobs to be done
  2. Tool by tool
  3. Helpdesk (Gorgias, Zendesk, Front)
  4. Returns (Loop, ReturnGO, AfterShip Returns)
  5. Fault claims (Resolvi)
  6. The routing rules that work
  7. Keeping data flowing between tools
  8. The most common failure mode

If you sell physical goods on Shopify at any scale, your support stack ends up with overlapping tools that each do part of the warranty job badly. Here's the layered architecture we landed on after watching brands struggle with all-in-one approaches that compromise everywhere.

The three jobs to be done

  1. General support — questions, address changes, order status, pre-sales
  2. Returns and exchanges — customer doesn't want the item (wrong size, changed mind)
  3. Warranty / fault claims — product failed and customer wants it to work

These look similar from the outside. Operationally they need different intake forms, different decision rules, different data, and different success metrics. The mistake we made early was forcing all three through one helpdesk and reaching for tags.

Tool by tool

Helpdesk (Gorgias, Zendesk, Front)

Owns inbound conversation. Best for general support, pre-sales, and anything that needs a human in the loop on email or chat. Should not own warranty claim state — its data model is a thread, not a structured claim.

Returns (Loop, ReturnGO, AfterShip Returns)

Owns the customer-doesn't-want-it path. Strong at shipping labels, exchanges, and refunds against orders that are still relatively young. Wrong tool for product faults — the data model is order-level, the customer emotion is different, and the resolution paths differ.

Fault claims (Resolvi)

Owns structured fault intake, item-level decisions, automated Shopify execution, and the analytics layer for product. Hands off to helpdesk for follow-up conversation, and stays out of the returns flow entirely.

The routing rules that work

  • Customer says "defective" or "broke" → fault claim portal, not helpdesk
  • Customer says "wrong size" or "changed my mind" → returns app
  • Anything else → helpdesk first, escalate as needed

Keeping data flowing between tools

Three integrations are non-negotiable. Fault claims need to write order tags back to Shopify so support sees claim status on the order page. Resolution emails need to thread into the helpdesk so agents have full context if the customer replies. And refund execution needs a single source of truth — pick the tool that fires the actual Shopify refund and standardise on it.

The most common failure mode

Trying to make one tool do all three jobs. Returns apps add "defective" as a return reason and call it warranty support. Helpdesks add a fault tag and call it tracking. Both work for ~50 claims a month. Both break around 200, and the team starts maintaining workarounds full-time.

Stop drowning in warranty tickets

Resolvi is built for Shopify brands that manufacture their own product. Structured fault claims, item-level decisions, automated Shopify execution.